Small Mosaic


Categories:

/books
/career
/codinghorrors
/events
/geekstuff
/justdont
/languages
/languages/bash
/linkshot
/magazines
/meta
/misctech
/movies
/nottech
/operatingsystems
/operatingsystems/linux
/operatingsystems/linux/debian
/operatingsystems/solaris
/perl
/presentations
/programming
/python
/ruby
/security
/security/apache
/security/tools
/serversmells
/services
/services/dns
/sites
/specifications
/sysadmin
/testing
/tools
/tools/commandline
/tools/firefox
/tools/gui
/tools/network
/tools/online
/tools/online/greasemonkey
/tools/puppet
/unixdaemon

Archives:

July 20111
June 20112
May 20113
April 20112
March 20117
January 20111
December 20103
November 20103
August 20101
July 20101
June 20104
May 20102
April 20101
March 20108
February 20101
January 20102
Full Archives

Tue, 07 Oct 2008

The answer might be 'it depends'
You're in charge of a server that provides two types of assets. The first type is public and its visibility is important to your company. The second should be restricted access only and shouldn't be public.

Now suppose there is a mistake made and the private material is exposed publicly - what's more important, that the public data is available or that the private data isn't? Who'd make that decision where you work? How long would it take to get an answer from them?

Like this post? - Digg Me! | Add to del.icio.us! | reddit this!

Posted: 2008/10/07 06:23 | /misctech | Permanent link to this entry | This entry and same date


books career codinghorrors events geekstuff justdont magazines meta misctech movies nottech operatingsystems/linux operatingsystems/linux/debian operatingsystems/solaris perl programming python ruby security security/apache security/tools serversmells services/dns sites sysadmin testing tools tools/commandline tools/firefox tools/gui tools/network tools/online tools/online/greasemonkey tools/puppet unixdaemon

Copyright © 2000-2010 Dean Wilson XML feed logo